Is Government Interference Right Essay - 583 Words

Should government have the right to interfere in our private lives? Does being part of a representative democracy mean that we abdicate our freedom to make our own choices in the name of the good of all? Should the government have the right to interfere in our private lives? Democracy guarantees freedom. One might then argue that a government should allow people to act according to their own free will. But there are two sides to every coin. Absolute independence might not lead to anything productive in an interdependent society as ours. There needs to be a basic framework of rules and guidelines to which all participants in that society agree to. According to Hobbes, human nature is such that if there were no rules or a law enforcing†¦show more content†¦Further taking the economic perspective into account, this would even help the nation as a whole by increasing its total production and achieving economic growth. This in turn could lead to greater equality amongst the citizens and the whole theory about levying taxes prospective in nature could be dropped without having any arguments. Government also tries to control our lives and means of sustenance by the affirmative action policies it has adopted. Democracy should ensure people the right to work irrespective of race or ethnicity. Worthy people have lost in this competition of the labor market just because he is not of some particular caste or religion. It sure has some positive sides to it but then again the minorities can be protected and nurtured by following the same policies of encouraging education and training in skills used in this labor market. Thus in my opinion, being a part of the representative democracy does not essentially imply that we renounce our freedom for the good of all. Further I feel that democracy has an in built system by which though people act in a manner such as to benefit themselves, in doing so the nation as a whole moves forward. This then further reduced the need of any more interference in our lives by our governments. The government though should enforce the laws, which ensure us with our rights and freedom to make our own choices. This should beShow MoreRelatedThe Argument Of Money Is A Lack Of Political Freedom888 Words   |  4 PagesCohen’s main argument is that a lack of money is a lack of political freedom. Freedom is a lack of interference. Money provides freedom in the form of taking out interference with access to different services (Cohen, 182). Money is not a way to avoid interference but a way to bypass it. The conclusion to his argument is that money is an implied freedom. Money has no purpose but to overcome interference. It cannot supply actual freedom to everyone, but it holds the potential glimmer of freedom. Read MoreEssay On Employment776 Words   |  4 Pagesfact that there are several Federal, State, and Local laws regarding hiring or firing somebody from a business, I truly believe that without the required interference from the government in this matter, business owners would not only take advantage from their employees, but they will also be able to incur in many violations of their employees’ rights. Furthermore, according to the U.S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, â€Å"Discriminatory treatment based on: race, color, sex, religion, national originRead MoreFreedom From A Good Thing Essay1734 Words   |  7 Pagesis the ability to be in control of one’s own life, free from internal obstacles to living the way one would rationally want to. People normally believe that ‘negative liberty is a good thing’, it is a very important for the state to prevent the interferences for an individual to act. However, it may not be an entirely good thing, because ‘negative liberty’ may not be sufficient by itself. As we understood, negative liberty means ‘freedom from’, and it is about the absence of external limits. ForRead MorePolitics is the Manner in Which Society is Organized1767 Words   |  7 Pagespopulation. Liberalism on the other hand is a philosophy of politics that has to do with the freedom of control and interference from a governmental organisation. The values of equality in liberalism and democracy are two very different but important ideals. Liberal equality is the process of equality where every person enjoys the same amount of non-interference from the government while democratic equality is equal input into collectively binding decisions. Democracy Democracy in its simplestRead MoreAmerican Desecration or Legal Articulation?693 Words   |  3 Pagesindividuality. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals decision in Johnson’s favor benefits the interests of all by protecting the first amendment right. In the case of Texas V. Johnson, I rule in favor of Johnson for the following reasons: Freedom of speech, protecting individual rights from government interference, and protecting individual rights from state interference. The first reason I rule in favor of Johnson in this case is because of the First Amendment to the U.S. constitution, freedomRead MoreImportance Of Classical Liberalism1371 Words   |  6 Pagesthe most favourable form of liberalism as it transcends the inhibitory factors such as sectarian values and emissive state interference and advances the state of individual and social freedoms’. Classical Liberalism is an ideology that stresses the importance of equal opportunity and a free-market society. Classical liberalism also has a common-sense view toward where government is required and where individuals should have the freedom of choice and private property and the people give their consentRead MoreArticle Vii Of The U.s. Constitution State That Laws Passed By Congress946 Words   |  4 Pagesstate that the rights and liberties of citizens are secure. Unless the government can prove that it has a very good reason to control individual’s freedom. By virtue of being human, all individuals are in possessions of certain natural rights, such as the right to a free trial and freedom of speech, freedom of religion. Civil liberties are freedoms that are guaranteed protection of people from an over-powerful government. Civil liberties are rights that cannot be restricted by government regardless ofRead MorePolitical And Economic Theory Is An Often Contentious Subject1582 Words   |  7 Pagescontentious subject as it relates to how much interference governments should be allowed when it comes to rights and welfare of the public. One of the most debated topics asks the question â€Å"is it a part of the government s role to take wealth away from the rich to give to the poor?† John Rawls and Robert Nozick offer two differing theories about the role of government in distributing wealth. John Rawls argues that a just society must have equal rights for all. He defines a society as an organizationRead MoreGovernment Interference in Our Private Lives Essay1216 Words   |  5 PagesPrivacy Matters in America In the United States today the government tries to interfere in private lives. There should be no more laws made letting the government interfere in the private lives of people and if there are, people should stand up against this invasion in people’s privacy and sat no. Should the government have the right to interfere in people’s private lives? Does being a part of a representative democracy mean that people can give up their freedom to make their own choices to benefitRead MoreEssay On Russian Interference755 Words   |  4 Pageshigh, domestically and globally. One headline in particular has become a permanent fixture in the media: foreign interference, specifically Russian, in the presidential election. Since the conclusion of the election, seventeen intelligence agencies of the US government have stated with confidence that they believe Russian interference took place (Montanaro 2017). This alleged interference took the form of â€Å"hacking† into compute r systems, coordinated propaganda dispersal, and incriminating e-mail â€Å"leaks†